Best Known (126−99, 126, s)-Nets in Base 2
(126−99, 126, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 126, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 126, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(126−99, 126, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (27, 126, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 126, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(126−99, 126, 38)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 126, 39)-net in base 2, because
- 16 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 110, 39)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2110, 39, S2, 3, 83), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 15576 890575 604482 885591 488987 660288 / 7 > 2110 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2110, 39, S2, 3, 83), but