Best Known (66, 115, s)-Nets in Base 9
(66, 115, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 115, 344)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 118, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 172)-net over F81, using
(66, 115, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (66, 115, 452)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 116, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 226)-net over F81, using
(66, 115, 41761)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 115, 41762)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 114, 41762)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 078870 604334 289218 862450 316162 216167 937885 847842 681883 184808 765275 212312 841685 010841 538163 018762 049498 716289 > 9114 [i]